Content at volume, with gates that actually stop things.
Retrieval-grounded editorial systems with mandatory human review and automated claim integrity checks. Built to raise output without dropping the floor.
- Audit and ground
- Template and gate
- Publish and measure
- Feed it back
Ungrounded generation is fluent, plausible and unverifiable — which is exactly the failure mode that gets sites penalised, and no amount of prompt engineering fixes it. The problem is missing information, not phrasing.
We build the production system around the model: retrieval against your real sources, structured templates, a named human with authority to reject, and automated checks on the claims that age badly. That combination is what separates scale that works from scale that gets you deindexed.
Concretely, what you get.
Grounded drafting
Retrieval over your catalogue, test results and live pricing. Generation becomes assembly, which is defensible.
Review gates
A named person accountable per section, with time and authority to reject. The gate only works if it sometimes stops something.
Integrity checks
Scheduled verification of price, availability and links. Retire rather than substitute — quietly swapping a dead recommendation is how a review site stops being one.
Media pipelines
Image and video generation and editing wired into publishing, with explicit rules about what must be a real photograph.
Structured data
Schema that describes what a page actually is, with rating provenance gated on verifiable data rather than editorial opinion.
Link architecture
Internal linking and taxonomy that surfaces the pages that earn instead of burying them three clicks deep.
- 01
Audit and ground.
Find the real sources the engine will retrieve against. No sources, no engine.
- 02
Template and gate.
Build the structures and the review queue, configured to your subject matter and risk tolerance.
- 03
Publish and measure.
Ship at volume, measure against search and revenue per page.
- 04
Feed it back.
What performs becomes the template. What doesn't gets retired.
Four ways in. Pick by what you need holding.
Most firms make you book a call to learn what it costs. Here are the ranges, the timelines, and what comes out the other end — so the first conversation can be about your project.
- 011 week
Scoping engagement
You have an idea, a prototype, or a stalled project and need a real plan with a real number.
from $15,000- → Written scope: what ships, what doesn't, what it costs
- → Architecture sketch with the cost-per-request model
- → Eval plan — how we'll know it works
- → Fixed price or rate-plus-ceiling for the build
Start with a scopeusually leads to product build - 026–16 weeks
Product build
You know what you need built and you want it running in production, in your repository, on a date.
$60,000 – $250,000- → A live system: web, native mobile, or agent — typed end to end
- → Thin slice in production by week three
- → Evaluation harness you can run yourself
- → Runbooks, a working local environment, a named handover
Scope a buildusually leads to retained operation - 038–20 weeks
Platform & infrastructure
The attribution spine, the data layer, or the multi-surface system the rest of the business stands on.
from $150,000- → First-party click tracking on your domains, server-side postbacks
- → Warehouse model reconciled to finance
- → Shared engines every property inherits
- → Integrity monitoring on the whole chain
Scope a platformusually leads to retained operation - 04Monthly, 3-month minimum
Retained operation
You want what we built to keep improving, with one accountable party and a weekly number.
from $12,000 / month- → Deploys, incidents, and iteration against the eval harness
- → Weekly one-page readout: what moved, what changed, what's next
- → Cost-drift and quality monitoring
- → An exit written into the agreement from day one
- Minimum
- Minimum engagement is $25,000. Below that, a senior build team rarely pays for itself and we will say so.
- Ranges
- Ranges, not quotes. The scoping week is what turns a range into a number, and it is credited against the build if you proceed.
- Ownership
- Every tier creates repositories, cloud accounts and domains in your name from the first commit. Nothing is held.
Asked and answered.
- Will AI content hurt our rankings?
- Unreviewed, undifferentiated content will. Content that's grounded, checked and structurally sound performs regardless of how it was drafted. The gates are the difference.
- Do you publish unverified claims?
- No. Anything that can't be confirmed is withheld rather than published with a caveat, and generated imagery is never presented as documentary photography.
- Can you retrofit this onto an existing site?
- Yes, and it's usually the fastest return available — most publishers are earning without knowing which pages are doing it.
- How does this help with AI answer engines?
- Specificity, verifiable claims and clean structured data are what get cited. Vagueness gets skipped because a summariser has nothing to summarise.
Need content engines?.
Two honest paragraphs beat a ten-page RFP. We answer inside one business day, and the first call is 45 minutes with someone who can scope it.
Or write directly — t@moher.ai